Close
Should I Stay in My Marriage for the Sake of My Children
NO
By Kaitlin Rothridge

First, let me say that if you’re in an abusive marriage, this is a no-brainer. If there is abuse in the home, there is no justifiable reason for staying.

Even if abuse isn’t present, staying in a loveless marriage is still the wrong option. Children know and recognize insincerity. If you don’t truly love your spouse, your children will know - and wonder when you will stop loving them, too. It’s difficult for you to show your children how to love your spouse when you don’t love him yourself.

If you and your spouse don’t share a genuine interest in working on the marriage, you’ll end up existing in a marriage instead of living in one. Under those circumstances, one parent or the other becomes ever more resentful of the situation and that resentment emerges in many forms. Often, it ends up being unintentionally directed towards the children. Children would rather be with two happy parents, even if those parents live separately, than with two parents who are miserable and making their home a battlefield.

Coming from a dysfunctional family is better than being in a dysfunctional family. You owe it to yourself to divorce, and find a happy loving relationship: a relationship that models for your children what married life as an adult should be like.

YES
By Angela Mascellino

It’s a well-known fact that half of all marriages end in divorce.

Although I don’t dispute that sometimes divorce is the only option, like when domestic violence, drug abuse and similarly damaging situations arise, I will say that, in this “Age of Me,” people are generally far too ready to toss aside their marriage commitments when things get difficult.

What part of “for better or for worse” do we fail to understand?

It’s long been said that marriage is less about finding the right person than about being the right person, but the wisdom of that statement is lost as we create co-dependent marriages that can be abandoned when our needs aren’t met, as if our spouses have violated some sort of contract by not making us happy.

It is our children who end up paying the cost of our selfish decisions. Statistically, children of divorce have a higher risk of turning delinquent, performing poorly in school, and experiencing serious emotional and social problems.

Simply put, we owe it to our children to put our families before our own personal wants. We need to demonstrate the importance of commitment, and show them the reality that good marriages don’t just happen: they are the result of hard work.

COMMENTS
I cannot believe anyone would agree with the NO writer. The only way a marriage should end is if there is abuse. Even then the abuse should be dealt with and if can't be helped then end the marriage. ENDING A MARRIAGE IS VERY DAMAGING TO THE CHILDREN. Instead how about letting the children see that mom and dad stick with it when the going gets tough. You just don't fall out of love. It doesn't happen. No way, no how. The YES writer hit it right on the noes. AGE OF ME. I want, I need, ME ME ME. Forever means FOREVER, not until something better comes along. There are ups and downs in life. Dumping a marriage cause things are down is no excuse. Our parents and parents parents didn't get divorced, they stuck together for better or worse. Divorce is for quitters. Hey Kaitlin your advice is about the stupidest thing I've ever read. "You owe it to yourself to divorce, and find a happy loving relationship:" That has to be the most selfish thing I've ever heard. You owe it to yourself. ME ME ME thinking there. The last part " that models for your children what married life as an adult should be like." Wow.. So you're saying to teach your children to get out of a commitment and find another one. If that fails quit that too. Because you owe it to YOURSELF. Show your kids that quitting is the best solution. What's your stand on bankruptcy. I suppose that's ok too. Just run up a bunch of bills and quit. Sure why not. Just quit and find something else.

I saw my mom and dad live a miserable life because they stayed together for "me". They divorced right after I went off to college and they are both happy and content! I wish that they had divorced when I was growing up because I would have seen two people I love happy instead of miserable.
Now I am not saying that they walked around sad faced! They tried to put of a good front but they still lived a lie.
So I would say that "me" is more imporant than "us" if the "us" is miserable.

Hey Rev Pat..is it appropriate for a Rev to call some stupid? No wonder people don't take religion or religious figures seriously any more. What a joke you are.

Casting the first stone are we Sharon? How's that self-righteousness taste? Stupid is another word for foolish. It is the responsibility of religion to uphold moral ethics at large as a contrast to foolishness. So yes, it can be very appropriate to be called stupid, by the clergy, if the wisdom and/or behavior are indeed stupid. Truth is unconcerned with tolerance or the pain-threshold of feelings.


Tell Us what You Think:
Your Name:
Email:( Will NOT appear on site )
What You Think:
Pin It